Adenoma and Adenocarcinoma of the Small Intestine
Differential Diagnosis
- Principal differential is from colorectal adenocarcinoma
- Because of the rarity of small intestinal carcinomas, most questionable cases should be considered colorectal
- Reports from Chen and Zhang suggest that immunohistologic stains may be useful:
Note that the opposite result is not always discriminatory; see Special Studies for complete staining resultsFavors Small Intestine Favors Large Intestine
Racemase positive
CK7 positive
CK7 negative
CK20 negative
SIMA negative
Villin negative
CDX2 negative
- Misplaced glands in a Peutz-Jeghers polyp must always be ruled out, especially in a young patient or a cytologically bland tumor
Peutz-Jeghers Polyp with Misplaced Glands Small Intestinal Adenocarcinoma Overlying typical hamartomatous polyp Overlying adenoma may be present Usually cytologically bland Usually cytologically malignant Glands may permeate muscle but no desmoplastic response Desmoplastic response usually present Lamina propria may be retained around entrapped glands No retained lamina propria around infiltrating glands Glands frequently have a mixed population of cell types - mucus, goblet, paneth cells Monomorphic population - Expression of MUC1 or MUC5AC has been suggested as favoring carcinoma over normal small intestinal mucosa (Zhang 2007)
- One report, however, describes basal staining of normal mucosa with MUC1 (Matsubayashi)
- MUC5AC stains normal goblet cells and gastric metaplasia
- Ultimately, the diagnosis of carcinoma must be made on morphologic grounds
- Positivity may suggest rebiopsy in a marginal specimen
- See Special Studies for complete staining results

