• Stanford School of Medicine
  •  use browser back button to return
  • Surgical Pathology Criteria
    http://surgpathcriteria.stanford.edu/

    Breast Carcinoma with Osteoclast-like Giant Cells

    Definition

    • Breast carcinoma with associated multinucleated cells

    Alternate/Historical Names

    • Carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells
    • Carcinoma with stromal multinucleated giant cells

    Diagnostic Criteria

    • Background carcinoma is otherwise unremarkable
      • Most types of carcinoma have been reported
        • Infiltrating ductal most common
        • Lobular, adenoid cystic, cribriform, tubular, papillary also reported
    • Multinucleated giant cells associated with the carcinoma
      • 3-50 nuclei
        • Cytologically bland
          • May have prominent nucleoli
        • No mitotic activity in giant cells
      • Usually located in stroma
        • Usually immediately adjacent to nests of carcinoma cells
        • Frequently associated with prominent thin walled vessels and hemosiderin
      • Occasionally located within lumens formed by carcinoma cells
    • Gross appearance frequently spongy and brown/red
    • Must not have sarcomatous or metaplastic stroma

    Richard L Kempson MD
    Robert V Rouse MD
    Department of Pathology
    Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford CA 94305-5342

    Original posting:: May 15, 2006

    Supplemental studies

    Immunohistology

    • Giant cells
      • Negative: keratin, EMA, CEA, GCDFP15, S100, Factor VIIIRa, ER, PR
      • Positive: CD68, LCA

    Differential Diagnosis

    Metaplastic Carcinoma of the Breast with Mesenchymal Differentiation Carcinoma of the Breast with Osteoclast-like Giant Cells
    Sarcomatous (malignant) stroma Only giant cells, no neoplastic stroma
    May form osteoid (osteosarcoma) No osteoid
    Other metaplastic carcinomas with non-mesenchymal differentation would not be confused with carcinomas with osteoclast-like giant cells

    Clinical

    • No clear clinical difference from breast carcinomas without giant cells
    • Age range 32-84 years
    • Reported to be about 0.5-1.2% of breast carcinomas

    Grading / Staging / Report

    Grading

    • Grade should be determined by the underlying carcinoma
      • The giant cells have no impact on grading

    • Bloom-Scarff-Richardson grading scheme is most widely used
    • Total score and each of the three components should be reported
    • Based on invasive area only
    Tubule formation Score
    >75% tubules 1
    10-75% tubules 2
    <10% tubules 3

     

    Nuclear pleomorphism (most anaplastic area) Score
    Small, regular, uniform nuclei, uniform chromatin 1
    Moderate varibility in size and shape, vesicular, with visible nucleoli 2
    Marked variation, vesicular, often with multiple nucleoli 3

     

    Mitotic figure count per 10 40x fields (depends on area of field, see key below) Score
    0.096 mm2 0.12 mm2 0.16 mm2 0.27 mm2 0.31 mm2
    0-3 0-4 0-5 0-9 0-11 1
    4-7 5-8 6-10 10-19 12-22 2
    >7 >8 >10 >19 >22 3
    • Olympus BX50, BX40 or BH2 or AO or Nikon with 15x eyepiece: 0.096 mm2
    • AO with 10x eyepiece: 0.12 mm2
    • Nikon or Olympus with 10x eyepiece: 0.16 mm2
    • Leitz Ortholux: 0.27 mm2
    • Leitz Diaplan: 0.31 mm2
    • Mitotic count figures based on original data presented for Leitz Ortholux by Elston and Ellis 1991, with modifications based on pubished and measured areas of view
    • Evaluate regions of most active growth, usually in cellular areas at periphery
    • We employ strict criteria for identification of mitotic figures
    Sum of above three components Overall grade
    3-5 points Grade I (well differentiated)
    6-7 points Grade II (moderately differentiated)
    8-9 points Grade III (poorly differentiated)

    Staging

    • TNM staging is the most widely used scheme for breast carcinomas but is not universally employed
    • Critical staging criteria for regional lymph nodes
      • Isolated tumor cell clusters
        • Usually identified by immunohistochemistry
          • Term also applies if cells identified by close examination of H&E stain
        • No cluster may be greater than 0.2 mm
        • Multiple such clusters may be present in the same or other nodes
      • Micrometastasis
          • Greater than 0.2 mm, none greater than 2.0 mm
      • Metastasis
        • At least one carcinoma focus over 2.0 mm
          • If one node qualifies as >2.0 mm, count all other nodes even with smaller foci as involved
        • Critical numbers of involved nodes: 1-3, 4-9 and 10 and over
      • Note extranodal extension

    Report

    • Excisions: the following are important elements that must be addressed in the report for infiltrative breast carcinomas
      • Grade
        • Total score and individual components
      • Size of neoplasm
        • Give 3 dimensions or greatest dimension
        • Critical cutoffs occur at 0.5 cm and at 2 cm
      • Margins of resection
        • Measure and report the actual distance of both invasive and in situ carcinoma
      • Angiolymphatic invasion
        • Indicate if confined to tumor mass, outside tumor mass or in dermis
      • (Extensive DCIS is not currently felt to be a significant predictor of behavior)
      • Results of special studies performed for diagnosis
      • Results of prognostic special studies performed
        • ER, PR, Proliferation marker, Her2neu
        • If studies were performed on a prior specimen, refer to that report and give results
    • Needle or core biopsies
      • Provisional grade may be given but may defer to excision for definitive grade
      • Presence of absence of angiolymphatic invasion
      • Results of special studies performed for diagnosis
      • Results of prognostic special studies if performed
        • ER, PR, Proliferation marker, Her2neu
        • State if studies are deferred for a later excision specimen
    • Regional lymph nodes
      • Report findings as described above

    Lists

    Infiltrating Breast Carcinomas

    Bibliography

    • Cai N, Koizumi J, Vazquez M. Mammary carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells: a study of four cases and a review of literature. Diagn Cytopathol. 2005 Oct;33(4):246-51.
    • Nielsen BB, Kiaer HW. Carcinoma of the breast with stromal multinucleated giant cells. Histopathology. 1985 Feb;9(2):183-93.
    • Holland R, van Haelst UJ. Mammary carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells. Additional observations on six cases. Cancer. 1984 May 1;53(9):1963-73.
    • Agnantis NT, Rosen PP. Mammary carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells. A study of eight cases with follow-up data. Am J Clin Pathol. 1979 Sep;72(3):383-9.
    • Iacocca MV, Maia DM. Bilateral infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast with osteoclast-like giant cells. Breast J. 2001 Jan-Feb;7(1):60-5.
    • Tavassoli FA, Norris HJ. Breast carcinoma with osteoclastlike giant cells. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986 Jul;110(7):636-9.
    Printed from Surgical Pathology Criteria: http://surgpathcriteria.stanford.edu/
    © 2005  Stanford University School of Medicine